Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 F.3d 147 - Tabron v. Grace

Tabron v. Grace’s Empirical Analysis

6 F.3d 147 · 1993

Citation profile

386
cited by 386 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
August 2022
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 42 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 386 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2022 · most notably Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital (2002), Alston v. Parker (2004)

46 federal appellate · 42 district ·

21401993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Wilson v. Seiter · Whitley v. Albers · Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of Iowa · Penson v. Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 386 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the plaintiffs ability to present his or her own case; (2) the difficulty of the particular legal issues; (3) the degree to which factual investigation will be necessary and the ability of the plaintiff to pursue investigation; (4) the plaintiffs capacity to retain counsel on his own behalf; (5) the extent to which a case is likely to turn on credibility determinations; and (6) whether the case will require testimony from expert witnesses.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “As a general rule we do not consider on appeal issues that were not raised before the district court.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““must take note of the significant practical restraints on the district courts’ ability to appoint counsel: the ever-growing number of prisoner civil rights actions filed each year in the federal courts; the lack of funding to pay appointed counsel; and the limited supply of competent lawyers who are willing to undertake such representation without compensation.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.