¶1 William F. Alen, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing several of his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) claims as time-barred and granting the Appellees’ motion for judgment of acquittal on the remaining claims. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district *207 court. See Allen v. Randolph, No. CA-99-1-4 (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED.