Hall v. Claussen’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1821 · 28 U.S.C. § 1920 · 42 U.S.C. § 12102 (§ 3 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12117 (§ 107 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12205 (§ 505 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981A
Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Bragdon v. Abbott · Crawford Fitting Company v. Jt Gibbons Inc Champion International Corporation · West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.