Neiberger v. Hawkins’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Creighton · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Siegert v. Gilley · Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. Romeo · Washington v. Harper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Claim one: violation of Colorado’s Care and Treatment of the Mentally Ill Act: (a) by named Plaintiffs against all Defendants, except Dr. Toerber, for in-junctive and declaratory relief, with no entitlement to damages; and (b) by class Plaintiffs against all Defendants, except Dr. Toerber, for in-junctive and declaratory relief, with no entitlement to damages. (2) Claim three: violation of the Due Process clause of the United States Constitution pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 : (a) by named Plaintiffs against all Defendants, except Dr. Toerber, for declaratory and injunctive relief; (b) by named Plaintiffs against Mr. Hawkins for damages in his individual capacity and for prospective injunctive relief in his official capacity; (c) by named Plaintiffs against Dr. Toerber for damages in his individual capacity incurred prior to February 28, 2001; and (d) by class Plaintiffs against all Defendants, except Dr. Toerber, for declaratory and injunctive relief only. (3) Claim four: violation of § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: (a) by named Plaintiffs against all Defendants, except Dr. Toerber, in their official capacities for declaratory and injunctive relief only; and (b) by class Plaintiffs against all Defendants, except Dr. Toerber, in their official capacities for declaratory and injunctive relief only.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Neiberger v. Hawkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.