Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 FCAS 546 - Corfield v. Coryell

Corfield v. Coryell’s Empirical Analysis

1823

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
10
cited 10 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions (10 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2025 · most notably Washington v. Glucksberg (1997), McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010)

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 22 state decisions

140182318301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Livingston v. Van Ingen · Putnam v. Wyley · Van Brunt v. Schenck · Ogden v. Gibbons · Jackson ex dem. Stoutenburgh v. Murray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different states in this union, the free inhabitants of each of these states ... shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several states; and the people of each State shall have free ingress and regress to and from any other State, and shall enjoy therein all the privileges of trade and commerce ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"The right of a citizen of one state to pass through, or to reside in any other state, for purposes of trade, agriculture, professional pursuits, or otherwise; to claim the benefit of the writ of habeas corpus; to institute and maintain actions of any kind in the courts of the state; to take, hold and dispose of property, either real or personal...."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Congress shall have Power . . . [t]o regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.