6 F. Supp. 2d 790 - TruServ Corp. v. Neff’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently October 2014
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404
Relies on Heller Financial, Inc. v. Midwhey Powder Co. · Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works · Vandeveld v. Christoph · 713 F. Supp. 1125 - Heller Financial, Inc. v. Riverdale Auto Parts, Inc. · 870 F. Supp. 870 - Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Sims
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred ..., (3) a judicial district in which any defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction at the time the action is commenced, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.