6 Haw. App. 554 - State v. Souza’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably 240 N.J. Super. 269 - State v. Maure (1990), Park v. Tanaka (1993)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 6 Cal. 3d 757 - People v. Superior Court · Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPA · People v. Adams · 1 Haw. App. 625 - State v. Liuafi · State v. Tengan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n meeting the foundational prerequisites for the admission of the Intoxilyzer test result there must be a showing of strict compliance with those provisions of the Rules which have a direct bearing on the validity and accuracy of the test result. [Footnote omitted.]”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(j) Testing for accuracy or calibration of all breath testing instruments and related accessories employed pursuant to this chapter shall comply with the following: (1) The supervisor shall assure that testing for accuracy or calibration is done; (2) Calibration testing shall be done not less frequently than every thirty days and after every instance of maintenance or repair; (3) Methods recommended by the manufacturer or approved by the department for the testing for accuracy or calibration shall be employed; (4) Results of tests for accuracy or calibration shall be noted in a permanent record, as required by Section 11 — 111—6(a)(2); (k) The recommended calibration testing method shall use a minimum of two reference samples of known alcohol concentrations at a known temperature within the range of one hundredths to thirty hundredths per cent weight per volume [0.01% to 0.30% W/V] or higher known alcohol concentrations that are recommended by the breath testing equipment’s manufacturer. The results of the analysis shall agree with the reference sample value within the limits of plus or minus one hundredths per cent weight per volume [+0.01% W/V] or such limits set by the director.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(2) The person operates or assumes actual physical control of the operation of any vehicle with 0.10 per cent or more, by weight of alcohol in the person’s blood.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.