6 Ill. App. 2d 23 - Hurley v. Finley’s Empirical Analysis
1955
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 1994 · most notably 18 Ill. App. 3d 230 - Forestview Homeowners Ass'n v. County of Cook (1974), 63 Ill. App. 3d 1012 - Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Harris Trust & Savings Bank (1978)
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brauer MacHine & Supply Co. Ex Rel. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Parkhill Truck Co. · Wightman v. Evanston Yaryan Co. · Hairgrove v. City of Jacksonville · Wood v. White · Bernero v. Bernero
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . If matters alleged in the intervening petition are true (which we assume to he true, for purposes of this appeal), then intervenor has a remedy afforded to it, as a matter of law. Its defenses may be raised in any subsequent proceeding where the plaintiff with a judgment would seek to collect the proceeds of the policy. There is no compelling reason confronting this court to force extension of the Rules relating to intervention or jurisdiction. ...””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The intervening company could not have been named in the first instance as a party defendant and a complete determination of the controversy involved in the original suit could have been had without the insurance company as a party. An insurance company is never a necessary or proper party defendant in an action for damages for personal injuries brought against its insured.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.