Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 Ill. App. 3d 909 - People v. Walker

6 Ill. App. 3d 909 - People v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently April 2023

18 state decisions

100197219801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · 43 Ill. 2d 256 - The People v. Sailor · 44 Ill. 2d 476 - The PEOPLE v. Derengowski · People v. Dale · 43 Ill. 2d 124 - The PEOPLE v. Morris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well established that where a direct appeal from a conviction has been taken, a defendant cannot raise in a post-conviction petition those issues which were or could have been reviewed in the direct appeal. (People v. Derengowski, 44 Ill. 2d 476 , 256 N.E.2d 455 ; People v. Dale, 406 Ill. 238 , 92 N.E.2d 761 ) * * The scope of review permitted in a post-conviction proceeding is not expanded simply because the petition is filed before the reviewing court hands down an opinion. Once an issue is presented on direct appeal to a court of review, it cannot properly be considered at a post-conviction hearing even though at the time of the hearing the reviewing court has not passed upon the question.” People v. Walker (1972), 6 Ill. App. 3d 909, 911 , 286 N.E.2d 812, 814-15 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.