Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

6 Johns. 129

Philips v. Hawley

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1810

New York Supreme Court · decided 1810-05-15

THE first suit was an action of debt, on a bond given » ,1 . , , 5>y the intestate» By the affidavit of the defendant’s attorney, it appearsd, that on the 21st March, 1809, the declaration and notice of rule to plead, in the first cause, were served A judgment was obtained against the defendant in the Srst cause, in May term, 1809, for the amount of the bond of the testator, on which the suit was brought, and an execution was issued, the 13th November last, returnable in the…

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 1851

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1810-05-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1There is no doubt that the plaintiff^ proceedings were regular, and that there has been alaches on the part of the defendant, or his attorney, in not applying at the term next after he was acquainted with the fact of a default having been entered. In any other case,- such a neglect would be fatal, and we would not afford relief; but in- the case of executors and administrators we will relieve, especially when the defendant knew nothing of the default, until it was too late to apply at the last term, and his attorney, though his ignorance was gross, seems not to- have been aware of the consequence of a judgment by default.

¶2Let the default, judgment and execution in the first cause be set aside, and the defendant plead in 8 days after service of a copy of the rule, on payment of the costs of the suit and of this application ;■ and let the proceedings in the second cause be stayed, until a trial can5be had in the first cause;, or if the plaintiff shall discontinue without further proceedings, the defendant must pay the costs of the said suit.

¶3Piule granted,.

/6/johns/129 · .json · Public domain