6 Johns. 333
Decided August 15, 1810
New York Supreme Court · decided 1810-08-15
<p>Though tho fZsoiveut1 be'“showed "to discontinue his suit, without coats, unless the defendant has obtained his discharge, under tlieli-EoH'rat, set.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1876
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1810-08-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1We have not allowed the plaintiff to discontinue, without costs, in case of the insolvency of the defendant, unless the defendant had obtained his discharge, under the insolvent act.
¶2Rule granted.
¶3 See Hart v. Stoi'ey, (t Johns. Rep. 143.) Merchants’ Rank v. Moore, N (2 Johns. Hep. 294.)