Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 Kan. App. 2d 529 - Cornejo v. Probst

6 Kan. App. 2d 529 - Cornejo v. Probst’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2018

4 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

1001981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re the Attorney General, Stephan · State v. Fenton · Traylor v. Wachter · Spencer v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co. · 5 Kan. App. 2d 682 - Johnson v. Haupt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"POST-TRIAL CALLING OF JURORS. Jurors shall not be called for hearings on post-trial motions without an order of the court after motion and hearing held to determine whether all or any of the jurors should be called. If jurors are called, informal means other than subpoena should be utilized if possible."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) Should the trial judge have granted defendant's request for a recall of the jury panel? (2) Can the jury verdict be impeached on a showing that the jury considered income tax and attorney fees during its deliberations?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “it is improper for a jury to consider federal or state income taxes in making a damage award.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.