6 Kan. App. 2d 617 - Landon v. Artz’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 67 Ill. App. 3d 914 - Thompson v. Safeway Enterprises, Inc. · Purser v. Corpus Christi State National Bank · Coats v. Milner · 3 Kan. App. 2d 298 - Alexander Construction Co. v. Weaver · Concannon v. Hampton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The thrust of [K.S.A. 60-3002] is to treat a foreign judgment once properly filed exactly like a Kansas judgment. To our knowledge it has never been thought that a counterclaim could be asserted in response to proceedings to enforce a Kansas judgment through execution, garnishment, or the like. Defenses may be asserted, and relief may be sought in an appropriate case by motion under K.S.A. 60-260(b). After final judgment, however, it is too late to asseit a claim for affirmative relief arising out of the transaction underlying the judgment.” Landon, 6 Kan. App. 2d at 618-19 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Padron v. Lopez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.