Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 Kan. App. 2d 651 - Schulte v. Franklin

6 Kan. App. 2d 651 - Schulte v. Franklin’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
June 1998
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Nordstrom v. Miller · Fuqua v. Hanson · Holden Land & Live Stock Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co. · ARKANSAS S. & L. ASS'N v. MacK Trucks of Ark. · Klusmire v. Dixon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any person so contracting for a greater rate of interest than that authorized by this section shall forfeit all interest so contracted for in excess of the amount authorized under this section; and in addition thereto shall forfeit a sum of money, to be deducted from the amount due for principal and lawful interest, equal to the amount of interest contracted for in excess of the amount authorized by this section and such amounts may be set up as a defense or counterclaim in any action to enforce the collection of such obligation and the borrower shall also recover a reasonable attorney fee.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Clear and convincing means simply that witnesses to a fact must be found credible; facts to which witnesses testify must be distinctly remembered, details must be narrated exactly and in order, testimony must be clear and direct and weighty and witnesses must be lacking in confusion as to facts at issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The parties to any loan evidenced by a note secured by a first real estate mortgage may stipulate therein for interest receivable upon the amount of such note at a rate not to exceed eleven percent (11%) per annum.” K.S.A. 1978 Supp. 16-207.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.