State v. Lottman’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1984
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Roberts v. State · 1 Kan. App. 2d 503 - Esters v. State · State v. Woodbury · 3 Kan. App. 2d 105 - City of Topeka v. Martin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An order finding a defendant guilty is not an appealable order and may not be appealed until the defendant is sentenced or the imposition of sentence is suspended pursuant to 22-3608. State v. Woodbury, 133 Kan. 1 , 298 Pac. 794 (1931); Roberts v. State, 197 Kan. 687, 689 , 421 P.2d 48 (1966); 21 Am. Jur. 2d, Criminal Law § 525, p. 509; 24 C.J.S., Criminal Law §§ 1556, 1648, 1649, 1653.” 3 Kan. App. 2d at 105 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Freeman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.