Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 Kan. App. 2d 766 - Simmon v. Bond

6 Kan. App. 2d 766 - Simmon v. Bond’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2009
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 2009

8 state decisions

40198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mull v. Colt Co. · Sharp v. Sharp · Colboch v. Aviation Credit Corporation · Hetman v. Fruit Growers Express Company · 28 F. Supp. 737 - Van Dyke v. Broadhurst

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Default, (a) Entry. Upon request and proper showing by the party entitled thereto, the judge shall render judgment against a party in default for the remedy to which the party is entitled. ... If the party against whom judgment by default is sought has appeared in the action, he or she (or, if appearing by representative, his or her representative) shall be served with written notice of the application for judgment at least three (3) days prior to the hearing on such application. If, in order to enable the court to enter judgment or to carry it into effect, it is necessary to take an account or to determine the amount of damages or to establish the truth of any averment by evidence or to make an investigation of any other matter, the court may conduct such hearings or order such references as it deems necessary and proper . . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Bazine State Bank v. Pawnee Production Service, Inc.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.