6 Kan. App. 2d 863 - Coward v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
4 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2013
4 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1671 · 15 U.S.C. § 1672 (Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 1674 · 26 U.S.C. § 3102 (Federal Insurance Contributions Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 3402
Relies on Kokoszka v. Belford · Brown v. Keill · Johnson v. McArthur · 7 Utah 2d 380 - Russell M. Miller Company v. Givan · 88 Wis. 2d 252 - John O. Melby & Co. Bank v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Thhe purpose of the wage garnishment exemption statute is to protect an employee and not an independent contractor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“compensation paid or payable for personal services”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.