¶1OPINION of the Court, by
¶2This is a writ of error with supersedeas to a judgment awarding execution upon a scire facias to revive a former judgment obtained by Woods against Patrick. The scire facias purported to be issued upon a judgment against Patrick and wife, and upon the motion of Woods was amended by' striking out the name of the wife.
¶3The only question is, whether the amendment was permissible or not ?
¶4We have no doubt that it was. Woods had given to the clerk written instructions to issue the scire facias against Patrick only ; and where a writ does not con*233form to the instructions given to the cleric, it may be amended thereby, according to the universal practice cf-this country and the precedents in the English books. But the amendment in this case was also justified by the former judgment : for a scire facias may be amended by the record in the original action — See Com. Dig. title Amendment, letter D. and the authorities there cited.
¶5The judgment must be affirmed with costs and damages.