Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 La. App. 248 - Lett v. Smith

6 La. App. 248 - Lett v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
December 1952
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1952

5 state decisions

301926193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hunter v. Burroughs · Wilson v. Snow · Roark v. Peters · George v. Shannon · Jones v. Tri-State Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We think the fact that plaintiff was severely burned is some evidence in itself'that the treatment was improper, and it cannot be said that the verdict lacks support in this respect in the evidence. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.