Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 Md. App. 466 - Makins v. State

6 Md. App. 466 - Makins v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2010

10 state decisions

40196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 5 Md. App. 450 - Williams v. State · 2 Md. App. 80 - Boone v. State · Corbin v. State · 5 Md. App. 571 - Boswell v. State · 4 Md. App. 590 - Reagan v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The incident as drawn clearly charged the appellant with the crime of daytime housebreaking with intent to steal the personal goods of another. Each of the elements of that crime was alleged, without regard to the particular apartment number specified, and none of the essential elements of the offense were changed by the amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Thompson v. State
  2. “As to what constitutes substance and what is merely formal in an indictment, it may be said that all facts which must be proved to make the act complained of a crime are matters of substance, and that all else — including the order of arrangement and precise words, unless they alone will convey the proper meaning — is formal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Thompson v. State
  3. “none of the essential elements of the offense were changed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Thompson v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.