6 Md. App. 631 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
2 district · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 2 Md. App. 271 - Gamble v. State · 4 Md. App. 181 - Gunther v. State · 2 Md. App. 262 - Reagan v. State · 4 Md. App. 328 - Morris v. State · 1 Md. App. 243 - Michael v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An assault predicated upon the doctrine of self-defense is justified only where the accused had reasonable grounds to believe and did believe that he was in apparent imminent peril of death or serious bodily harm from his actual or potential assailant. It is the task of the trier of facts to determine whether the accused was justified in meeting force with force. Upon finding such justification, the force used against the assailant must not have been unreasonable or excessive, that is, the defender must not have used more force than the exigency reasonably demanded.” Brown and Shepard v. State, 6 Md. App. 631 , 252 A. 2d 887 (1969). (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.