Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

6 Mich. 328

Moore v. Olin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 1859

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1859-05-18

<p>The Supreme Court lias no power to require an appellant in chancery to give a new or farther appeal bond, in addition to the one approved by the circuit court commissioner, and which is alleged to be insufficient.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1859-05-18

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently January 1940

4 state decisions

101859186018701880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

The Chief Justice;

¶1This Court has no jurisdiction over the subject of this motion. The statute (§3597, Comp. L.) requires the party claiming an appeal in chancery to execute a bond conditioned to perform the decree of this Cdurt, &c. The penalty of *329this bond is to be fixed, and the sureties approved, by a judge or circuit court commissioner. The power vested in these officers is exclusive; and to entertain this motion, or any other of a kindred nature, would be, in reality, the exercise of an appellate jurisdiction not vested in the Court. If the bond were solely to secure the payment of costs, the rule might be different, for courts may have power over this subject independent of statutory provisions.

¶2However desirable it may be that the power should be vested in this Court to review the judgment of the officer fixing the penalty of the bond and approving the sureties, we can not exercise such a power without legislation authorizing it.

¶3Motion denied.

/6/mich/328 · .json · Public domain