Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

6 Misc. 266

Holtham v. Holtham

New York City Court

Decided December 15, 1893

New York City Court · decided 1893-12-15

<p>Even if a husband should not he committed to jail for nonpayment of alimony when he is unable to pay, the burden is upon him, when proceeded against, to establish his poverty and show that hé cannot earn enough to support his wife and children.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1939

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1893-12-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Clement, Ch. J.

¶1This is an appeal from an order finding-the defendant guilty of contempt in failing to pay alimony.' The appellant admitted that he owed the amount, eighty dollars, but claimed that he was out of work and had no means.

¶2Assuming, as claimed by counsel for the appellant, that a husband should not be committed to jail for contempt for nonpayment of alimony when he is unable to pay, the burden was on the appellant to establish his poverty, and to show that he could not earn money enough to support his wife and two children of the ages of eight and ten years. His wife has been compelled to earn her living by washing and scrubbing, and the husband has paid her nothing since June 23, 1893.

¶3The judge at Special Term was not satisfied by the affidavits of the defendant and his mother that he could not pay the amount due, and his conclusion seems to us the correct one, after carefully reading the record.

¶4The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to be taxed by the clerk.

¶5Van Wyok, J., concurs.

¶6Order affirmed, with costs.

/6/misc/266 · .json · Public domain