Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 N.C. App. 365 - State v. Hill

6 N.C. App. 365 - State v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2014

20 state decisions

140196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Williams · State v. Roberts · State v. Church · State v. Aldridge · State v. . Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule is well settled that general objections will not be entertained if the evidence consists of several distinct parts, some of which are competent and others not. In such case the objector must specify the grounds of the objection, and it must be confined to the incompetent evidence. Unless this is done he cannot afterwards single out and assign as error that part of the evidence which was incompetent.” State v. Hill, 6 N.C. App. 365, 368 , 170 S.E. 2d 99, 101 (1969).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.