Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 N.J. 12 - Fox v. Snow

Fox v. Snow’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
5
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

78 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably Coons v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (1984), 431 So. 2d 454 - Tideway Oil Programs, Inc. v. Serio (1983)

78 state decisions

1601950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Hurtado v. People of the State of California · John Smith v. Robert Bell · Ide v. Ide · 133 N.J. Eq. 421 - In Re the Estate of Fisler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The doctrine of stare decisis neither renders the courts impotent to correct their past errors nor requires them to adhere blindly to rules that have lost their reason for being. The common law would be sapped of its life blood if stare decisis were to become a god instead of a guide. The doctrine when properly applied operates only to control change, not to prevent it."”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"`The doctrine of stare decisis tends to produce certainty in our law, but it is important to realize that certainty per se is but a means to an end, and not an end in itself. Certainty is desirable only insofar as it operates to produce the maximum good and minimum harm and thereby to advance justice. . . . When it appears that the evil resulting from a continuation of the accepted rule must be productive of greater mischief to the community than can possibly ensue from disregarding the previous adjudications on the subject, courts have frequently and wisely departed from precedent, 14 Am.Jur., Courts , § 126.'"”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “It is revolting to have no better reason for a rule of law than that so it was laid down in the time of Henry IV. It is still more revolting if the grounds upon which it was laid down have vanished long since, and the rule simply persists from blind imitation of the past.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.