Massari v. Einsiedler’s Empirical Analysis
1951
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 8 district · 60 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably Cogdell v. Hospital Center at Orange (1989), Crowe v. De Gioia (1982)
3 federal appellate · 8 district · 60 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cromwell v. County of Sac · Knox County v. Harshman · Steiner v. Stein · Green v. Stone · O'NEILL v. Vreeland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Subject to rules of the Supreme Court, the Law Division and the Chancery Division shall each exercise the powers and functions of the other division when the ends of justice so require, and legal and equitable relief shall be granted in any cause so that all matters in controversy between the parties may be completely determined.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]here adequate relief can be obtained in the Law Division, there is no need for intercession by the Chancery Division since the entire controversy can be determined in the Law Division in one and the same suit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“of the Judicial Article of the 1947 Constitution was to facilitate ... the hearing of causes by disposing of all matters ... arising in a controversy in one trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Prevratil v. Mohr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.