6 N.J. Super. 395 - State v. Weeks’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 1974
23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Daugherty · Clarence Murphy v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · King v. United States · Ekberg v. United States · Kitt v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court may correct an illegal sentence at any time.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“* * * Kitt cannot validly contend that the original sentence must be set aside to permit a resentence, while at the same time those provisions of the original sentence providing for concurrent, rather than consecutive, terms of imprisonment must be kept alive for his protection.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“was disclosed by the records to be illegal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.