¶1I concur with the chief justice, in that this case ought to be sent back for another trial, as there are errors in the admission of certain evidence which might have influenced the size of the verdict. The plaintiff in error is entitled to a trial in which such evidence is not before the jury.
6 N.M. 611
New Mexican Railroad v. Hendricks
Decided August 24, 1892
New Mexico Supreme Court · decided 1892-08-24
Ebbob, from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, to tbe Fourth. Judicial District Court, San Miguel County. O’Bbien, O. J., and Seeds, J., dissenting, on the ground it did not appear the verdict oould not be reduced on a new trial. • • The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Cited in Ballentine's (1916)’s definition of “Reversible error” · Black's (1910)’s definition of “Error”
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Judgment affirmed · Decided 1892-08-24
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 1967
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →