¶1— The act of 22d March did not authorize a writ of error in behalf of the people, where the judgment sought to be reviewed was rendered before the act was passed.
¶2Writ dismissed.
¶3 See People v. Clark, 7 N. Y. 385.
6 N.Y. 463
Decided July 15, 1852
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1852-07-15
Motion to dismiss writ of error. Henry Carnal having been convicted of murder, in the court of oyer and terminer of New York, sued out a writ of error from the supreme court, where the judgment of the oyer and terminer was reversed, and a new trial awarded, in February 1852.
Relies on The People v. . Clark
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1852-07-15
Cited by 10 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1935
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1— The act of 22d March did not authorize a writ of error in behalf of the people, where the judgment sought to be reviewed was rendered before the act was passed.
¶2Writ dismissed.
¶3 See People v. Clark, 7 N. Y. 385.