6 N.Y. 522
Decided October 15, 1852
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1852-10-15
168.) This was a suit to set aside an assignment for the benefit of creditors, made by the firm of G. & H. Hunt-ting, on the 18th September 1848, as fraudulent and void, as to creditors; and to subject the assigned property to- the payment of the plaintiff’s judgment. It presented the same question as the case of Nicholson v. Leavitt.
Relies on Porter v. . Williams and Clark
Decided 1852-10-15
¶1— Judgment affirmed, for the reasons given in Nicholson v. Leavitt.
¶2 The doctrine of these cases was reaffirmed, in Porter v. Williams, 9 N. Y. 142; Kellogg v. Slauson, 11 Ibid. 302; and Rapalee v. Stewart, 27 Ibid. 310. And see Brigham v. Tillinghast, 13 Ibid. 215, 219.