6 Ohio App. 2d 155 - State v. McClellan’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
October 1977
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 148 Ohio St. 473 - State v. Petro · 113 Ohio St. 46 - Grossweiler v. State · State v. Sallee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A motion was also filed to require the prosecuting attorney to permit defendant, before trial, to examine certain exhibits which he intended to introduce in the trial. This motion was made after the trial was in progress and came too late. It was, therefore, a matter in which the court should act in the exercise of its sound discretion. * * State v. McClellan, 6 Ohio App.2d 155, 159 , 217 N.E.2d 230, 233 (1966).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Aldridge
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.