Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 Ohio App. 3d 30 - State v. Whiteside

6 Ohio App. 3d 30 - State v. Whiteside’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably State v. Iacona (2001), State v. Davis (2010)

28 state decisions

11019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kent v. United States · State v. Carmichael · 49 Ohio St. 2d 77 - State v. Lane · In re Becker · 36 Ohio App. 2d 99 - State v. Hsie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) Preliminary hearing. In any proceeding where the court may transfer a child fifteen or more years of age for prosecution as an adult, the court shall hold a preliminary hearing to determine if there is probable cause to believe that the child committed the act alleged and that such act would be a felony if committed by an adult. Such hearing may be upon motion of the court, the prosecuting attorney or the child.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is not necessary to determine that the child is not amenable to care or rehabilitation in an institution for delinquent children. Rather the court must determine that there are reasonable grounds to believe such is the case”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “1. A hearing under R.C. 2151.26 is a preliminary stage of the juvenile judicial process and contemplates that the court should have considerable latitude within which to determine whether it should retain jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.