6 Ohio St. 2d 261
Decided June 15, 1966
Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1966-06-15
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
““Where an employee, member of a union, is retired at the age of sixty-five under a compulsory retirement provision of a pension program that is a part of a collective bargaining agreement between his employer and the union to which he belongs, such employee is ‘discharged for just cause in connection with his work’ as that phrase is used in Section 4141.29(D)(2)(a), Revised Code.””
quoted by 1 later decision, including Russell v. Bureau of Unemployment Compensation
Relies on 4 Ohio App. 2d 95 - Marcum v. Ohio Match Co.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1966-06-15
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2015
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The question presented is whether each of the claimants “quit his work without just cause or has been discharged for just cause in connection with his work,” within the meaning of that provision as found in Section 4141.29 (D)(2)(a), Revised Code. This question is answered in the affirmative for the reasons stated in Marcum v. Ohio Match Co., 4 Ohio App. 2d 95.
¶2The judgment of the Court of Appeals in each case is affirmed.
¶3Judgments affirmed.