Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 Ohio St. 3d 91 - State v. Davis

6 Ohio St. 3d 91 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

99
cited by 99 later decisions
2
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

94 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably State v. Thomas (1988), State v. Kidder (1987)

94 state decisions

37019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jordan v. Arizona · Ohio v. Wilkins · State v. Kilby · State v. Nolton · State v. Strodes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if the fear of the alleged victim was of such a nature as in reason and common experience is likely to induce a person to part with property against his will and temporarily suspend his power to exercise his will by virtue of the influence of the terror impressed.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(3) Use or threaten the immediate use of force against another.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “* * * merely because one offense can be a lesser included offense of another does not mean that a court must always instruct on both offenses where the greater offense is charged. However, such an instruction is required where the trier of fact could reasonably find against the state and for the accused upon one or more of the elements of the crime charged, and for the state and against the accused on the remaining elements, which, by themselves, would sustain a conviction upon a lesser included offense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.