Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 Okla. Crim. 521 - Bivens v. State

6 Okla. Crim. 521 - Bivens v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1912

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2019

1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

3019121920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Flohr v. Territory of Oklahoma · Martin v. Territory of Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think the information sufficiently charges the crime of larceny by fraud.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.