Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · 98 Wash. 2d 434 - Wilson v. Steinbach · 121 Wash. 2d 38 - Van Dinter v. City of Kennewick · Ravenscroft v. Washington Water Power · 79 Wash. App. 212 - Chamberlain v. Department of Transportation
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ny public or private landowners or others in lawful possession and control of any lands . . . who allow members of the public to use them for the purposes of outdoor recreation . . . without charging a fee of any kind therefor, shall not be liable for unintentional injuries to such users.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Because we cannot determine whether the injury-causing condition was latent, artificial, and known to the State without first specifying the object or instrumentality at issue, this is a critical question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the specific object or instrumentality that caused the injury, viewed in relation to other external circumstances in which the instrumentality is situated or operates.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.