Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

6 Port. 333

Bettis' v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1838

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1838-01-15

At the present term of the Supreme court, the death of the plaintiff below was suggested, by his administrator the plaintiff in error, and the court moved for process to bring the case into this court for the revision of the judgment below. Upon which motion, the court delivered the following opinion.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1899

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1838-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

COLLIER, C. J.

¶1The plaintiff presented to the court the transcript of a record from the Circuit court of Mobile, which shewed that the defendant recovered a judgment against Wm. II. Howell, and caused an execution to be issued and levied on some negro slaves; to which the plaintiff’s intestate, as the administrator of Caleb Howell, deceased, interposed a claim under the statute. Upon trial, the slaves were condemned to the *334satisfaction of defendant’s execution, and a judgment rendered against the plaintiff’s intestate, in his individual capacity. The plaintiff’s intestate died since the rendition of the judgment against him, and the court was moved for process to bring the case into this court, for the revision of that judgment.

¶2The case of Seawall vs. Bates' Adm'r.* is an authority to shew, that where a party dies after judgment, process may issue from this court to bring the case up. In that case, a certiorari was awarded.

¶3We think a writ of error the more appropriate remedy: anddo therefore direct, that a writ of error issue in the name of the plaintiff, as administrator, to bring up a transcript of the record; that a scire facias issue advising the defendant of the issuance of the writ of error, and requiring him to shew cause why he should not be allowed to prosecute it: and that the writ of error contain a clause, directing execution of the judgment to be suspended, upon the plaintiff entering into bond with sufficient security, in a like penalty, and with like condition, as is required where the writ of error issues from that court.

¶42 Stew. Rep. 462; 3 ib. 199.

/6/port/333 · .json · Public domain