Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 SD 626 - Lawrence County v. Meade County

Lawrence County v. Meade County’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 1944
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Black Hills Flume & Mining Co. v. Grand Island & W. C. R. · Ross v. Wait

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The so-called ‘order’ was a final judgment, dismissing ' the action, and awarding costs to the defendant. That it was a judgment clearly appears from the concluding portion,, which is as follows: ‘And, the court being fully advised in the premises, it is ordered and adjudged that said objection be sustained, and the complaint herein be dismissed, with costs, and that the defendant have and recover of plaintiff its costs, taxed at,’ etc. This was a final determination of the action.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.