6 So. 3d 1262 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Holloway v. Arkansas · 561 So. 2d 1130 - In Re Order on Prosecution of Cr. App. · 644 So. 2d 996 - Guzman v. State · 978 So. 2d 134 - Crist v. FL. ASS'N OF CRIM. DEFENSE LAWYERS
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The determination that a conflict results from representation of multiple defendants in any court is an issue turning on privileged facts lying beneath the professional judgment of the [public defender] — facts that are simply incapable of being made known in court without compromising the client. The decision to assert such a conflict resides in the presumed good faith of lawyers as officers of the court having the duty to avoid such conflicts. The lawyer involved in the case is the person with the primary responsibility of avoiding unethical representation and of asserting and protecting the interests of the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.