6 So. 3d 215 - State v. Ambeau’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited
18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 839 So. 2d 1 - State v. Smith · 488 So. 2d 965 - State v. Rosiere · 424 So. 2d 1009 - State v. Quebedeaux
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The articulation of the factual basis for a sentence is the goal of Art. 894.1, not rigid or mechanical compliance with its provisions. Where the record clearly shows an adequate factual basis for the sentence imposed, resentencing is unnecessary even when there has not been full compliance with Art. 894.1. State v. Landos, 419 So.2d 475 (La.1982). The reviewing court shall not set aside a sentence for excessiveness if the record supports the sentence imposed. La. C.Cr.P. art. 881.4(D).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.