6 So. 3d 237 - State v. Ardoin’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2016
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 523 So. 2d 1305 - State v. Mussall · 946 So. 2d 654 - State v. Ordodi · 822 So. 2d 141 - State v. Patorno · 422 So. 2d 138 - State v. Simmons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A. Aggravated incest is the engaging in any prohibited act enumerated in Subsection B with a person who is under eighteen years of age and who is known to the offender to be related to the offender as any of the following biological, step, .or adoptive relatives: child, grandchild of any degree, brother, sister, half-brother, half-sister, uncle, aunt, nephew, or niece. B. The following are prohibited acts under this Section: (1) Sexual intercourse, sexual battery, aggravated sexual battery, carnal knowledge of a juvenile, indecent behavior with juveniles, pornography involving juveniles, molestation of a juvenile, crime against nature, cruelty to juveniles, parent enticing a child into prostitution, or any other involvement of a child in sexual activity constituting a crime under the laws of this state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The State must prove several elements to establish the offense of aggravated incest. First, the State must show that the victim was under eighteen years of age. Second, the State must show that the offender knew that the victim was related to him within the specified degrees. The statute enumerates a list of relatives who may be victims of the offense and specifies that the offender must be aware of his relationship to the victim. Finally, the State must prove that the defendant has engaged in one of the prohibited acts with the victim. See State v. Flores, 27,736, p. 5 (La.App. 2 Cir. 2/28/96), 669 So.2d 646, 650 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Molestation of. a juvenile' is ■ clearly a lesser and included offense because it does not require proof of any element that is hot required in the charged offense of aggravated, incest. Molestation of a juvenile is one of the listed prohibit■ed-acts in the aggravated incest statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.