Brazery v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 462 So. 2d 740 - Mitchell v. State · 669 So. 2d 220 - Clayton v. State · Goodgain v. State · 572 So. 2d 1316 - Mallette v. State · 652 So. 2d 319 - Chasteen v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ “While it is not necessary that a probationer be convicted of the charged offense before the probation is revoked, it is nevertheless true that the filing of charges or an arrest, standing alone, is insufficient ground for probation revocation.’ Mitchell v. State, 462 So.2d 740, 742 (Ala.Crim.App.1984). ‘“The State must submit enough substantive evidence to reasonably satisfy the trier of the facts that a condition of probation was breached.” ’ Mitchell v. State, 462 So.2d at 742 (quoting Hill v. State, 350 So.2d 716, 718 (Ala.Crim.App.1977)).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vaughn v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.