Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 Storey 162 - Pepper v. Hoffecker

Pepper v. Hoffecker’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 1989
most recently cited

1 district · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Island Express, Inc. v. Frederick · Giguere, Admr. v. Rosselot · 166 Pa. Super. 351 - MENDOLA v. Sambol · Cooke v. Elk Coach Line, Inc. · 80 Ga. App. 880 - Skelton v. Gambrell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is negligence to permit a third person to use a thing or to engage in an activity which is under the control of the actor, if the actor knows or should know that such person intends or is likely to use the thing or to conduct himself in the activity in such a manner as to create an unreasonable risk of harm to others.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.