Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 SW3D 312 - Burke v. State

Burke v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
November 2014
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Missouri v. Hunter · Bradley v. Ohio · Thomas v. Southtrust Bank of Alabama · Bush v. Vera · LTV Steel Co. v. Shalala

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When ... the Legislature has carved out specific circumstances under which a specific statute governs, the Legislature has not created greater and lesser included offenses. Rather, the Legislature has determined the one statute that governs and has removed from the State the option of prosecuting for the general offense where the circumstances of the case establish only the specific offense. In this case, we are not faced with determining which offense the State would have chosen to prosecute.... The question before us is, instead, a matter of legislative intent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.