Christopher Wardlow v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 167th Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Powers v. Ohio · Purkett v. Elem · Salazar v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“MR. GUERINOT: We would like the record to reflect that this juror is a black male, and we would ask the State to specifically state in the record, after your voir dire and mine, the racially impartial reason that they are exercising a strike. THE COURT: That will be denied, being the fact that the Defendant in this case is white. He is not part of any racial minority MR. GUERINOT: Thank you. Note our exception. THE COURT: Give the gentleman an excuse and tell him he is free to go. MR. MORRIS: In addition to that, if it be needed — probably doesn't need to — our point would be, of course, the records of the two brother-in-laws [sic], one robber and one dope pusher, and he says they can be rehabilitated, even though they have been up twice before. THE COURT: Tell him he's free to go and thank him for being with us.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Moody v. Quarterman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.