Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 S.W.3d 862 - Phillips v. Fallen

Phillips v. Fallen’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
5
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Shaffer v. Heitner · Pennoyer v. Neff · Kulko v. Superior Court of California in and for City and County of San Francisco · Durfee v. Duke · 119 Wash. 2d 667 - Lewis v. Bours

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] foreign judgment, regular on its face, ... is entitled to a strong presumption that the foreign court had jurisdiction both over the parties and the subject matter and the court followed its laws and entered a valid judgment. The burden to overcome the presumption of validity and jurisdiction must be met with the clearest and most satisfactory evidence, and this burden lies with the party asserting the invalidity of the foreign judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(A) neither the child, nor the individual obligee, nor the obligor do not reside in the issuing state; (B) the petitioner who is a nonresident of this State seeks modification; and (C) the respondent is subject to the personal jurisdiction of this state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.