Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 S.W.3d 899 - Silcox v. Silcox

Silcox v. Silcox’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
3
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

43 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 407 (§ 207 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board · Kuchta v. Kuchta · Mistler v. Mistler · Rombach v. Rombach · In Re Marriage of Kohring

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he court shall set apart to each spouse such spouse’s nonmarital property and shall divide the marital property and marital debts in such proportions as the court deems just after considering all relevant factors including: (1) The economic circumstances of each spouse at the time the division of property is to become effective, including the desirability of awarding the family home or the right to live therein for reasonable periods to the spouse having custody of any children; (2) The contribution of each spouse to the acquisition of the marital property, including the contribution of a spouse as homemaker; (3) The value of the nonmarital property set apart to each spouse; (4) The conduct of the parties during the marriage; and (5) Custodial arrangements for minor children.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The right of any person to any future payment under this subchapter shall not be transferable or assignable, at law or in equity, and none of the moneys paid or payable or rights existing under this subchapter shall be subject to execution, levy, attachment, garnishment, or other legal process, or to the operation of any bankruptcy or insolvency law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “If by any fair interpretation both statutes may stand, there is no repeal by implication and both statutes must be given their effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.