Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 TC 621 - Strom v. Commissioner

Strom v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
February 1988
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 1988

6 federal appellate ·

6019461950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Choate v. Trapp · United States v. Lineas Winans · Tulee v. State of Washington · Choteau v. Burnet · Superintendent of Five Civilized Tribes v. Commissioner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is here no express exemption from tax in the treaty with the Quinaielt Indian Tribe. The income which respondent seeks to tax is in the "untrammeled possession” of the petitioners, with no restriction upon its use by them. We do not agree with the argument that the imposition of the tax upon income earned by these petitioners in carrying on a commercial fishing business on the Quinaielt River is a restriction upon the right to fish guaranteed by the treaty. The Quinaielt Indians on the reservation were as free to fish in the Quinaielt River after the imposition of an income tax as they were prior to that time. The disputed income tax is not a burden upon the right to fish, but upon the income earned through the exercise of that right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * The' taxpayer here is a citizen of the United States, and wardship with limited power over his property does not, without more, render him immune from the common burden.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.