¶1August 21.
¶2delivered the opinion of the Court.
¶3This case differs from Tomlin’s adm’r v. How’s adm’r, Gilm. 1, in this, that no good reason appears upon the record, why the additional plea of the Act of Limitations was not sooner tendered.
¶4The Judgment should be affirmed.
¶5 The President and Judge Coadter, absent.