Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 6 Va. App. 334 - Funderburk v. Commonwealth

6 Va. App. 334 - Funderburk v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United Transportation Union v. Taylor · Simpson v. Commonwealth · State v. Washington · State v. Washington · Plunkett v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he studies or tables consulted by [the serologist] to arrive at the statistical prevalence of [the victim’s] blood type are of a type customarily relied upon and consulted by those in her field. Such information and knowledge is within the expertise of the forensic serologist, and the court did not err [in admitting] her testimony when the studies or tables [were] not in evidence or not identified.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he brochure was prepared as a collection of data customarily available to gemstone appraisers in general. It was analogous to a medical treatise consulted by an expert or to a real estate record consulted by a real estate appraiser. The objective nature of the current market data contained in the brochure lends credence to the trustworthiness of the information.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.